when 1.5 million Shiite & Syrian government supporters lead by Hezbollah demonstrate in the heart of Beirut carrying Khomeini pictures and Bashaar al Asaad & say shit like Na3am Souriya Al Assad etc. who are they supporting in this case scenarios! & how is “Orange” moving with this direction

If not the Arabs neither the westerns provide weapons to Hezbollah then who does!

When Hezbollah meets from the international community 2 presidents only Najadi & Asaad then who is he allying with? Does he speak Arabic or English with Najadi? Let’s try Persian.

So Aoun goes to the congress and passes a bill of accounting Syria and to disarm Hezbollah, then, comes and allies with them both, what do u expect the American administration and the international community to do? tap him on his back. American policy is clear, Hezbollah is a threat to the American government and interests in the region, no one can hide that, however regionally and internally Hezbollah war machine is an equal threat. And honestly Hezbollah had not a single contribution to Lebanon but damage. Aoun helped in doing nothing, rather pushed everyone away, and managed to divide the damn country again and again!

So all that and u come and say u need evidence and Nahar is bias! Pls tell us what else is required for us to believe?

If Aoun cares for the xtians he would remove the damn tents from beirut which btw managed to effect the xtians only, since 90% of business owners in that area are non muslims.

I hear you; the others are not angels in Lebanon, but Hezbollah war machine and Aoun’s craving for the damn presidential seat is exhausting the last breaths of this country. America now serves our interest, no matter what, i dont see Iran as a better support nor syria.

trust me on that, I saw original articles for ex from AFP or AP and Naharnet’s one, stated “naharnet AFP or naharnet AP’ with the changes they made. They are directing original agencies depeche toward the majority objectives. It is not ethical at all.
Naharnet is not better then Al Manar in their propaganda’s objective. The only thing changing is that Al Manar at least is honest as we do see it s propaganda.

Did i talk about HA or was I answering about naharnet’s case. It seems that HA for you is like a way to diverse the medias’s problem extremising the population or are you just making a commerce from this secterian extremisation?
It is not your political staff that is guilty on a population level, it is our medias, LBCI, Nahar, L orient, Al Manar etc… are all guilty.
Just check out what foreign medias said about the election and compare it to local medias. Look to the Jerusalem Post, I wonder how in lebanon they are transforming a lost into a “win” situation and check out the medias with their mental masturbation about it. They are completly crazy and insane.

What proof do you need to establish that HA is a terrorist group ? do you want them to start another war ?

Let them state their sources, give evidences etc… instead of being the “al Manar” for the other side.

The Orange lobby in the states was supporting the 1559 and the SAA then turned on them to ally with Hezbollah and Syrians. US administration has every reason to doubt their intentions and consider them a threat.